NSW Attorney General says there are limits for Court technology

<p>According to the NSW Attorney-General&comma; technology is unlikely to replace physical court appearances for high-stake areas as much as it has a role to play in addressing court delays&period; Recently&comma; a pilot Online Court for civil cases in the Local Court General Division was approved by the NSW Attorney-General’s office&period; This service is relevant in the sense that it removes the need for parties to travel to the court repeatedly since it allows documents to be filed outside court hours&period; As a matter of fact&comma; the online process can be used appropriately for cases that do not involve fundamental breach of a person’s liberty or safety&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>On the other hand&comma; technology has a role to play when it comes to civil justice or where people just want to resolve things in the ordinary course of their business&period; But the demeanour of the defendant is taken into account by the judge and jury especially in criminal proceedings&period; As much as technology might have a role to play in the criminal justice system&comma; chances are very rare that it will replace the trial&period; However&comma; the experience of people in custody can be improved while creating efficiencies when the use of audio-visual link is implemented&period; Therefore&comma; there is also need to introduce a system that treats defendants who are accused of the most serious crime charges with humanity&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Sometimes&comma; it might cost correctional services and police much time by shuttling people in custody back and forth to court&comma; hence this is unnecessary since it affects the defendant negatively&period; For example&comma; in Lismore&comma; people in custody often experience a six-hour trip when returning to attend court proceedings from Grafton Correctional Centre&period; Gabrielle Upton&comma; who happens to be the first female attorney-general appointed by NSW in April&comma; told Aussie Lawyer Blog that over the past year&comma; the NSW courts have been experiencing delays and the hardest hit being the NSW District Criminal Court&period; Between 2007 and 2014&comma; trial delay in the NSW District Criminal Court increased by 34 per cent according to a report released by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;This report was arrived at based on lots of factors including the increasing complexity of evidence and serious crime being targeted more by police due&comma; in part&comma; to technology&comma;” said Gabrielle Upton&period; In addition&comma; Ms&period; Upton endorsed the NSW Law Reform Commission’s recommendation that was made in December 2014&period; The recommendation suggested that appropriate early guilty pleas be encouraged&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>As the court prepares for a trial that will not take place&comma; guilty pleas made late in proceedings waste resources and time&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;For the benefit of justice&comma; it is advisable that the jury settles on a guilty plea early since it encourages minds to meet between private or public defenders and crown prosecutors around the case&comma;” said Ms&period; Upton&period; She also said that other suggestions from stakeholders for reducing delays include creating broader jurisdiction and having judges sit longer in the local court&period; According to Ms Upton&comma; addressing the &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;low utilisation of court assets” is a key part of the solution to delays in court proceedings&period; <&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version